Data cables and the Construction Products Regulations
![]() |
**In addition to the flame propagation classes for cables outlined in the table above, there are three other sub-categories of cable fire performance for the classes B1ca to Dca. More information about these is available in the application guide, Cable and CPR, available exclusively to ECA Members. |
Contents |
[edit] The CPR and cable reaction in a fire
More than ever, data communications and control cables are built into the fabric of homes and offices, alongside traditional power cables. But with more connectivity comes a larger number of conduits along which a fire could spread. Data comms, power and control cables come under the Construction Products Regulation (CPR), designed to consider the reaction of cables in a fire. As such, they must be selected carefully before an installation.
[edit] Stopping fire in its tracks
Government statistics show that, in England, in 2017/18, almost 31,000 fires involving fatalities, casualties or rescues occurred in homes, and over 15,000 occurred in other buildings (offices, shops, hospitals, schools, etc). In about seven per cent (approximately 3,400) of these fires, wiring insulation was identified as the main material responsible for the fire propagating.
The same statistics also concluded that “the most commonly identified cause of death from a fire incident is being overcome by gas or smoke.”
Clearly, the type of cable installed, and the way it reacts to fire, is a critical consideration for designers and installers.
Data communications cables currently available in the UK are insulated, bedded or sheathed with materials such as PVC, TPE, Nylon, metal weaving and mercerised cotton. Each reacts differently to fire and will have a different EuroClass rating.
In the event of a fire, these materials may, to different degrees, produce toxic smoke and acidic gases. They might also act as a fuel, helping to propagate flames along cables and through a building and its voids. This danger is further exacerbated by falling flaming droplets caused by melting.
The smoke and gases given off by burning cables can hinder a building’s occupants from escaping a in event of a fire. It can also inhibit firefighters by blocking their vision and reducing the effectiveness of emergency lighting.
Another less immediately obvious side effect of acidic gases may be corrosion of other metallic components – often within electrical and electronic equipment.
[edit] What about Brexit?
Despite Britain’s intention to leave the European Union, it is understood that CE marking will remain a pre-requisite for any manufacturer, importer or distributor wishing to sell their cables within the EU. What we know for certain is that CPR will still apply to all construction sales, both in the EU and in the UK.
[edit] Top of the class
Under CPR, European Classification replaces IEC 60332-1-2:2004, which was the previous benchmark for assessing the flammability of cables. Because methods of testing cables have changed drastically, direct comparisons to the old standard are not exactly straightforward. The table at the top of this page clarifies the classes.
Some readers may notice that these seven classes broadly align with classes Aca to Fca used for other construction products, and which are already referred to in UK Building Regulations.
It is clear that a cable in class Aca would be the best in terms of fire performance, and an Eca cable would be seen as the worst. Class Fca cables should be used with caution or avoided entirely if possible, as it would be of unknown origin with no identification markings or labelling.
[edit] Selecting and designing with CPR
In all cases, the designer or cable specifier will be ultimately responsible for selecting the appropriate classification of cable.
‘Best practice’ would dictate that safety should always be the first consideration, especially for buildings where vulnerable people may be restricted in their ability to escape a fire, such as care homes or hospitals.
Similarly, high-rise buildings, buildings with high fire risk or buildings with high traffic, such as offices, shopping centres or conference centres, would also warrant higher levels of safety from the hazards of burning cables.
[edit] About the CPR
The CPR covers all construction products and classifies them by their reaction to fire. It is also the reason behind the CE marks seen on many construction products.
To keep up with the new ways cables in buildings are made, installed, used and maintained, the CPR was updated and became a legal requirement in 2017*.
This development was met with some confusion, particularly over the new European Classification (or EuroClass) system which replaced the old Construction Products Directive (CPD).
An obvious benefit of the CPR is that it enables designers, specifiers and other industry professionals, as well as consumers, to compare the safety performance of products that may have come from different manufacturers. In other words, it allows easy like-for-like comparison between products.
- Since 1 July 2017, it has been a legal requirement in the UK for manufacturers, distributors or importers to make a Declaration of Performance (DoP) and apply CE marking on relevant cables (i.e. those intended to be permanently installed within a building).
[edit] About this article
This article was written by Gary Parker. It previously appeared in the Autumn 2019 issue (pp 28-29) of ECA Today, the magazine of the Electrical Contractors Association and can be accessed HERE.
More articles by ECA on Designing Buildings Wiki can be accessed HERE.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Electric.
- Electrical appliance.
- Electrical consumption.
- Electrical energy.
- Electrical equipment.
- Electrical installation.
- Electrical power.
- Electrical safety.
- Electrician.
- Electricity bill.
- Attestation of conformity.
- British Board of Agrément.
- Building regulations.
- CE marking.
- Construction Products Regulation if there is no Brexit deal.
- Energy related products regulations.
- European Technical Approval.
- Fire dampers.
- Grommet.
- Kitemark.
- Quality control.
- Specification.
--ECA
Featured articles and news
Mixed reactions to apprenticeship and skills reform 2025
A 'welcome shift' for some and a 'backwards step' for others.
Licensing construction in the UK
As the latest report and proposal to licence builders reaches Parliament.
Building Safety Alliance golden thread guidance
Extensive excel checklist of information with guidance document freely accessible.
Fair Payment Code and other payment initiatives
For fair and late payments, need to work together to add value.
Pre-planning delivery programmes and delay penalties
Proposed for housebuilders in government reform: Speeding Up Build Out.
High street health: converting a building for healthcare uses
The benefits of health centres acting as new anchor sites in the high street.
The Remarkable Pinwill Sisters: from ‘lady woodcarvers’ to professionals. Book review.
Skills gap and investment returns on apprenticeships
ECA welcomes new reports from JTL Training and The Electrotechnical Skills Partnership.
Committee report criticises UK retrofit schemes
CIOB responds to UK’s Energy Security and Net Zero Committee report.
Design and construction industry podcasts
Professional development, practice, the pandemic, platforms and podcasts. Have we missed anything?
C20 Society; Buildings at Risk List 2025
10 more buildings published with updates on the past decade of buildings featured.
Boiler Upgrade Scheme and certifications consultation
Summary of government consultation, closing 11 June 2025.
Deputy editor of AT, Tim Fraser, discusses the newly formed society with its current chair, Chris Halligan MCIAT.
Barratt Lo-E passivhaus standard homes planned enmasse
With an initial 728 Lo-E homes across two sites and many more planned for the future.
Government urged to uphold Warm Homes commitment
ECA and industry bodies write to Government concerning its 13.2 billion Warm Homes manifesto commitment.
From project managers to rising stars, sustainability pioneers and more.
Places of Worship in Britain and Ireland, 1929-1990. Book review.